PICTURES

Please refer to:

   http://newwoodrizon.blogspot.com/2015/11/pictures.html?m=0

EVALUATION

•         Think about the outcome
•            Because of the magnets and stiff hinges, the paper will be attached to the artefact.
• •       Does it meet the Design Brief?
•             Yes, we were able to create an artefact that can hold paper, but not very effective tho due to our materials thrown away accidentally.
• •       Does it satisfy the Evaluation Criteria?
•               Partially, yes. It holds paper but sometimes it doesn't. We wouldn't consider it a failure because our materials were thrown accidentally and the magnets we bought were quite cheap because we don't know how strong they were at the time.
• •       How well does it work?
•                 It works for small pieces of paper. Some areas work effectively while some doesn't.
• •       Are there any parts that can be improved?
•                 Yes. We could use better magnets next time and we could also be more careful with our materials.
• •       What remains to be done?
•                  Designs. We could add cool design to it if we are given time.
• •       What is the best feature of the artefact?
•                   Portability. It is foldable; therfor it is portable. It can fit in small places and it light.
• •       What is the least satisfactory feature?
•                   It has a dull look to it. It looks very plain.
• •       Are there any unexpected problems?
•                   The magnets were an unexpected problem. We didn't expect them to be weak. We also lost an important piece.
• •       Are there any unexpected benefits?
•                    Yes, the portability. We didn't expect it to be quite light. It's all thanks to good woods. Cheers!
• •       Is the artefact aesthetically pleasing?
•                  Yes
• •       Is the artefact ergonomically sound? 
•                      Yes

PRODUCTION LOGBOOK

Date: Week 1

     Procedure: Interviewing and brainstorming for ideas

     Cogitation: This is very important. We had a hard time designing the artefact

Date: Week 2

     Procedure: Preparing of materials and cutting of wood

     Cogitation: This could be moved to another time because the wood might be damaged

Date: Week 3

     Procedure: Cutting of wood

     Cogitation: This is risky. We damaged our parts here

Date: Week 4

     Procedure: Cutting of wood

     Cogitation: After a week of experience, cutting became easier

Date: Week 5

     Procedure: Cutting of wood

     Cogitation: We're already pro at cutting of woods. Yey!

Date: Week 6

     Procedure: Cutting, fixing, and assembling

     Cogitation: Almost finished... This is an easy part of creating the artefact

Date: Week 7

     Procedure: Cutting, fixing, and assembling wooden parts as well as attaching the magnets and putting on the varnish

     Cogitation: The magnets we bought were cheap so the artefact didn't function well

PROGRESS CHART

STEP	W1	W2	W3	W4	W5	W6	W7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7

PRODUCTION PLAN

Step	Procedure/Materials	Tools/Equipment	Risk	Time
1	Interview and brainstorm	None	None	1 week
2	Smoothen the wood	Sand Paper	None	1 day
3	Cut the wood	Jig Saw	Wrong measurement	6 weeks
4	Smoothen the cut pieces and remove excess parts	Plainer, Sander, Chisel, and Hammer	Removal of essential parts	2 week
5	Assemble the wooden parts	Hammer and Drill	None	2 Weeks
6	Attach the metal and magnets	Hammer, Jig saw, and Chisel	Embedding too deep	1 week
7	Finishing touches	Paintbrush, sand paper	None	2 Days

TOOLS AND EQUIPMENTS

Tools and equipment we intend to use:

• Plainer
• Hammer
• Sander
• Sand Paper
• Jig Saw
• Chisel
• Drill
• Paintbrush

CUTTING LIST

Part	No.	Material	Length	Width	Thickness
Supports	1	Wood	16	1	0.5
Pillars	4	Wood	5.3	2	0.5
Clips	4	Wood	16	1	0.5
Stick	1	Wood	16	1	0.5